Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Xian
dc.contributor.authorBiederman, Joel A.
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, John F.
dc.contributor.authorScott, Russell L.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Alexander J.
dc.contributor.authorDannenberg, Matthew P.
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorFrankenberg, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLitvak, Marcy E.
dc.contributor.authorFlerchinger, Gerald N.
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Beverly E.
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Hyojung
dc.contributor.authorReed, Sasha C.
dc.contributor.authorParton, William J.
dc.contributor.authorBarron-Gafford, Greg A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, William K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T22:23:36Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T22:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.citationWang, X., Biederman, J. A., Knowles, J. F., Scott, R. L., Turner, A. J., Dannenberg, M. P., Köhler, P., Frankenberg, C., Litvak, M. E., Flerchinger, G. N., Law, B. E., Kwon, H., Reed, S. C., Parton, W. J., Barron-Gafford, G. A., & Smith, W. K. (2022). Satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and near-infrared reflectance capture complementary aspects of dryland vegetation productivity dynamics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 270.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2021.112858
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/663058
dc.description.abstractMounting evidence indicates dryland ecosystems play an important role in driving the interannual variability and trend of the terrestrial carbon sink. Nevertheless, our understanding of the seasonal dynamics of dryland ecosystem carbon uptake through photosynthesis [gross primary productivity (GPP)] remains relatively limited due in part to the limited availability of long-term data and unique challenges associated with satellite remote sensing across dryland ecosystems. Here, we comprehensively evaluated longstanding and emerging satellite vegetation proxies in their ability to capture seasonal dryland GPP dynamics. Specifically, we evaluated: 1) reflectance-based proxies normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), near infrared reflectance index (NIRv), and kernel NDVI (kNDVI) from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); and 2) newly available physiologically-based proxy solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). As a performance benchmark, we used GPP estimates from a robust network of 21 western United States eddy covariance tower sites that span representative gradients in dryland ecosystem climate and functional composition. We found that NIRv and SIF were the best performing GPP proxies and captured complementary aspects of seasonal GPP dynamics across dryland ecosystem types. NIRv offered better performance than the other proxies across relatively low-productivity, sparsely non-evergreen vegetated sites (R2 = 0.59 ± 0.13); whereas SIF best captured seasonal dynamics across relatively high-productivity sites, including evergreen-dominated sites (R2 = 0.74 ± 0.07). Notably, across grass-dominated sites, all reflectance-based proxies (NDVI, SAVI, NIRv and kNDVI) showed significant seasonal bias (hysteresis) that strengthened with the total fraction of woody vegetation cover, likely due to seasonal patterns in woody vegetation reflectance that are unrelated to or decoupled from GPP. Future efforts to fully integrate the complementary strengths of NIRv and SIF could significantly improve our understanding and representation of dryland GPP dynamics in satellite-based models.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subjectDryland heterogeneityen_US
dc.subjectGross primary productivityen_US
dc.subjectNear-infrared reflectanceen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_US
dc.subjectSolar-induced fluorescenceen_US
dc.titleSatellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and near-infrared reflectance capture complementary aspects of dryland vegetation productivity dynamicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizonaen_US
dc.identifier.journalRemote Sensing of Environmenten_US
dc.description.note24 month embargo; published online: 31 December 2021en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.piiS0034425721005782
dc.source.journaltitleRemote Sensing of Environment
dc.source.volume270
dc.source.beginpage112858


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Manusript.pdf
Embargo:
2023-12-31
Size:
5.307Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record