Evaluating the perceived utility of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support system for depression treatment using a simulation center
Name:
EoU2 Resubmission to Psychiatry ...
Size:
626.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Tanguay-Sela, MyriamBenrimoh, David
Popescu, Christina
Perez, Tamara
Rollins, Colleen
Snook, Emily
Lundrigan, Eryn
Armstrong, Caitrin
Perlman, Kelly
Fratila, Robert
Mehltretter, Joseph
Israel, Sonia
Champagne, Monique
Williams, Jérôme
Simard, Jade
Parikh, Sagar V.
Karp, Jordan F.
Heller, Katherine
Linnaranta, Outi
Cardona, Liliana Gomez
Turecki, Gustavo
Margolese, Howard C.
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022-02Keywords
Artificial intelligenceMajor depressive disorder
Outpatient treatment
Patient-Physician Relationship
Physician-patient relationship
Primary care
Simulation center
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Tanguay-Sela, M., Benrimoh, D., Popescu, C., Perez, T., Rollins, C., Snook, E., Lundrigan, E., Armstrong, C., Perlman, K., Fratila, R., Mehltretter, J., Israel, S., Champagne, M., Williams, J., Simard, J., Parikh, S. V., Karp, J. F., Heller, K., Linnaranta, O., … Margolese, H. C. (2022). Evaluating the perceived utility of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support system for depression treatment using a simulation center. Psychiatry Research, 308.Journal
Psychiatry ResearchRights
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Aifred is a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses artificial intelligence to assist physicians in selecting treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) by providing probabilities of remission for different treatment options based on patient characteristics. We evaluated the utility of the CDSS as perceived by physicians participating in simulated clinical interactions. Twenty physicians who were either staff or residents in psychiatry or family medicine completed a study in which they had three 10-minute clinical interactions with standardized patients portraying mild, moderate, and severe episodes of MDD. During these scenarios, physicians were given access to the CDSS, which they could use in their treatment decisions. The perceived utility of the CDSS was assessed through self-report questionnaires, scenario observations, and interviews. 60% of physicians perceived the CDSS to be a useful tool in their treatment-selection process, with family physicians perceiving the greatest utility. Moreover, 50% of physicians would use the tool for all patients with depression, with an additional 35% noting that they would reserve the tool for more severe or treatment-resistant patients. Furthermore, clinicians found the tool to be useful in discussing treatment options with patients. The efficacy of this CDSS and its potential to improve treatment outcomes must be further evaluated in clinical trials.Note
12 month embargo; available online: 11 December 2021ISSN
0165-1781Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
McGill Universityae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114336
