Cursed Concepts: New insights on combinatorial processing from ERP correlates of swearing in context
Affiliation
Department of Linguistics, University of ArizonaCognitive Science Program, University of Arizona
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Donahoo, S. A., Pfeifer, V., & Lai, V. T. (2022). Cursed Concepts: New insights on combinatorial processing from ERP correlates of swearing in context. Brain and Language.Journal
Brain and LanguageRights
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Expressives (damn) convey speaker attitude and when used in context (Tom lost the damn dog) can be flexibly applied locally to the noun (dog) or globally to the whole sentence (the situation). We used ERPs to explore brain responses to expressives in sentences. Participants read expressive, descriptive, and pseudoword adjectives followed by nouns in sentences (The damn/black/flerg dog peed on the couch). At the adjective late-positivity-component (LPC), expressives and descriptives showed no difference, suggesting reduced social threat and that readers employ a ‘wait-and-see’ strategy to interpret expressives. Nouns preceded by expressives elicited a larger frontal P200, as well as reduced N400 and LPC than nouns preceded by descriptives. We associated the frontal P200 with emotional salience, the frontal N400 with mental imagery, and the LPC with cognitive load for combinatorics. We suggest that expressive adjectives are not bound to conceptual integration and conclude that parsers wait-and-see what is being damned.Note
12 month embargo; available online: 13 January 2022ISSN
0093-934XVersion
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105079