Stroke-Specific Refinements to Naylor's Transitional Care Model to Address the Storm of Uncertainty and Unmet Survivor and Caregiver Needs
Name:
Laws et al_Final Manuscript_Stoke ...
Size:
228.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
College of Nursing, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2021-12-09Keywords
Care continuityCare partner
Caregiver
Community
Recovery
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Survivor
Transitional care
Transitional care model
Transitions of care
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Laws, L., Ritter, L., Loescher, L., & McEwen, M. (2022). Stroke-Specific Refinements to Naylor’s Transitional Care Model to Address the Storm of Uncertainty and Unmet Survivor and Caregiver Needs. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.Journal
Journal of Neuroscience NursingRights
Copyright © 2021 American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BACKGROUND: By 2030, there will be approximately 7.6 million stroke survivors (SSs) in the United States, yet comprehensive transitional care (TC) for stroke is not widely available. Stroke strikes without warning and leaves in its wake a "storm"of uncertainty for SSs and caregivers (CGs) as they encounter a myriad of unmet physical, mental, emotional, and financial needs that are not wholly addressed by passive healthcare delivery systems. Needed is a stroke-specific TC model that bridges this stormto active delivery of SS and CG postacute care. Naylor's Transitional Care Model (NTCM) has not been examined for how it can frame comprehensive stroke care. The purpose of this study was to solicit SS and CG descriptions of TC experiences to inform the NTCM with refined operational definitions and exemplars specific to stroke. METHODS: Focus groups conducted for this qualitative descriptive study were guided by interview questions based on the 8 NTCM operational definitions. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis methods. RESULTS: Post-acute-stroke care does not comprehensively meet the needs of SSs and CGs. Participants described TC deficits across all 8 NTCM components. Two new subcomponents that could be applied for a stroke-specific NTCM emerged: Psychological and transportation challenges. CONCLUSION: Unmet needs identified by SSs and CGs were used to extend NTCM specific to the stroke population and to develop the Recommendations and Exemplars for Stroke Specific Comprehensive Transitional Care Delivery (see Supplementary Digital Content, available at http://links.lww.com/JNN/A385). Researchers and practitioners can use the findings to develop and deliver more comprehensive TC to SSs and CGs.Note
12 month embargo; published 01 February 2022ISSN
0888-0395EISSN
1945-2810Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/jnn.0000000000000629