Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, J.
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Latt, L.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, R.D.
dc.contributor.authorMannen, E.M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T22:48:47Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T22:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWang, J., Daniel Latt, L., Martin, R. D., & Mannen, E. M. (2022). Postural Control Differences between Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction and Healthy People during Gait. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19031301
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/663469
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) may exhibit postural instability during walking likely due to a loss of medial longitudinal arch, abnormal foot alignment, and pain. While many studies have investigated gait alterations in PTTD, there is no understanding of dynamic postural control mechanisms in this population during gait, which will help guide rehabilitation and gait training programs for patients with PTTD. The purpose of the study was to assess dynamic postural control mechanisms in patients with stage II PTTD as compared to age and gender matched healthy controls. Methods: Eleven patients with stage II PTTD (4 males and 7 females; age 59 ± 1 years; height 1.66 ± 0.12 m; mass 84.2 ± 16.0 kg) and ten gender and age matched controls were recruited in this study. Participants were asked to walk along a 10 m walkway. Ten Vicon cameras and four AMTI force platforms were used to collect kinematic and center of pressure (COP) data while participants performed gait. To test differences between PTTD vs. control groups, independent t-tests (set at α < 0.05) were performed. Results: Patients with PTTD had significantly higher double stance ratio (+23%) and anterior-posterior (AP) time to contact (TTC) percentage (+16%) as compared to healthy control. However, PTTD had lower AP COP excursion (−19%), AP COP velocity (−30%), and medial-lateral (ML) COP velocity (−40%) as compared to healthy controls. Mean ML COP trace values for PTTD were significantly decreased (−23%) as compared to controls, indicating COP trace for PTTD tends to be closer to the medial boundary than controls during single-support phase of walking. Conclusion: PTTD patients showed more conservative and cautious postural strategies which may help maintain balance and reduce the need for postural adjustment during PTTD gait. They also showed more medially shifted COP patterns than healthy controls during single-support phase of walking. Dynamic postural control outcomes could be used to develop effective gait training programs aimed at alleviating a medial shift of COP (everted foot) for individuals with PTTD in order to improve their functionality and gait efficiency. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectCenter of pressure
dc.subjectGait
dc.subjectPostural control
dc.subjectPTTD
dc.subjectTime-to-boundary
dc.titlePostural Control Differences between Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction and Healthy People during Gait
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-04T22:48:47Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ijerph-19-01301-v2.pdf
Size:
903.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).