We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Sex differences in the foraging behavior of a generalist hawkmoth
Name:
Sex Differences MS IS Revision ...
Size:
312.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of ArizonaDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2021-04-27
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
Smith, G. P., Davidowitz, G., Alarcón, R., Papaj, D. R., & Bronstein, J. L. (2022). Sex differences in the foraging behavior of a generalist hawkmoth. Insect Science, 29(1), 304-314.Journal
Insect ScienceRights
© 2021 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Within-species variation in pollinator behavior is widely observed, but its causes have been minimally investigated. Pollinator sex is associated with large differences in behavior that may lead to predictable differences in flower foraging, but this expectation has not been explicitly tested. We investigate sex-associated differences in nectar-foraging behavior of the hawkmoth Hyles lineata, using pollen on the proboscis as a proxy for flower visitation. We tested two predictions emerging from the literature: 1) the sexes differ in the flower species they visit, 2) females are more specialized in flower choice. We also examined potential drivers underlying these predictions by performing field and laboratory experiments to test whether males 3) switch among flower species more frequently, or 4) fly farther and therefore encounter more species than females. Consistent with prediction 1), pollen load composition differed between the sexes, indicative of visitation differences. Contrary to prediction 2), females consistently carried more species-rich pollen loads than males. 3) Both sexes switched between flower species at similar rates, suggesting that differences in floral fidelity are unlikely to explain why females are less specialized than males. 4) Males flew longer distances than females; coupled with larger between-site differences in pollen composition for females, this result suggests that sex differences in mobility influence foraging, and that females may forage more frequently and in smaller areas than males. Together, our results demonstrate that sex-associated foraging differences can be large and consistent over time, and highlight the importance of sex as a driver of variation in pollinator behavior.Note
12 month embargo; first published: 27 April 2021ISSN
1672-9609EISSN
1744-7917Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/1744-7917.12926