LRO-LAMP Observations of the Preperihelion Coma of Comet C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring)
Name:
Magaña_2022_Planet._Sci._J._3_ ...
Size:
1.136Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Magaña, L.O.Retherford, K.D.
Bodewits, D.
Feaga, L.M.
Grava, C.
Feldman, P.D.
Greathouse, T.K.
Noonan, J.W.
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Astronomical SocietyCitation
Magaña, L. O., Retherford, K. D., Bodewits, D., Feaga, L. M., Grava, C., Feldman, P. D., Greathouse, T. K., & Noonan, J. W. (2022). LRO-LAMP Observations of the Preperihelion Coma of Comet C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring). Planetary Science Journal.Journal
Planetary Science JournalRights
Copyright © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP) UV spectrograph on board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter observed comet C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring) from lunar orbit at closest approach. On 2014 September 5, Siding Spring came within ∼0.89 au of the Earth–Moon system and provided an opportunity for LAMP to contribute to the broader campaign of observations. The comet coma was imaged during two consecutive orbits, approximately 2 hr apart. Coma emissions of atomic oxygen were resolved within LAMP observations at distances up to ∼1.4 × 106 km from the comet nucleus. We report an atomic production rate for the observed oxygen of 9.42 ± 0.22 × 1027 s−1. We additionally place upper limits on the column densities of candidate species including noble gases and primary transitions. Leveraging this, we place upper limits on the production of hydrogen and carbon of <3.59 × 1026 s−1 and <8.41 × 1025 s−1, respectively. Additionally, we derive OH and H2O production rates and estimate an upper limit on the production of CO. The H2O (8.17 ± 2.64 × 1027 s−1) and OH (7.53 ± 2.244 × 1027 s−1) production rates are found to be in general agreement with previous studies when production rates are derived utilizing oxygen observations, branching ratios, and empirical formulations. Similarly, the upper limit on the production of CO (<1.33 × 1028 s−1) is found to be in good agreement with previous studies (within ∼10%) when we utilize the upper limit on CO Fourth Positive group emissions. © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2632-3338Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/PSJ/ac3fa5
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.