Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAljuhani, O.
dc.contributor.authorAl Sulaiman, K.
dc.contributor.authorHafiz, A.
dc.contributor.authorEljaaly, K.
dc.contributor.authorAlharbi, A.
dc.contributor.authorAlgarni, R.
dc.contributor.authorAl Homaid, S.
dc.contributor.authorKahtani, K.
dc.contributor.authorAlsulaiman, T.
dc.contributor.authorVishwakarma, R.
dc.contributor.authorAl Ghamdi, G.
dc.contributor.authorAlalawi, M.
dc.contributor.authorKorayem, G.B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T00:03:41Z
dc.date.available2022-03-18T00:03:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAljuhani, O., Al Sulaiman, K., Hafiz, A., Eljaaly, K., Alharbi, A., Algarni, R., Al Homaid, S., Kahtani, K., Alsulaiman, T., Vishwakarma, R., Al Ghamdi, G., Alalawi, M., & Korayem, G. B. (2022). Comparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers, observational study. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.
dc.identifier.issn1319-0164
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsps.2022.01.022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/663641
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher in patients who experienced thromboembolic events. Thus, several guidelines recommend using prophylactic anticoagulants in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients. However, there is uncertainty about the appropriate dosing regimen and safety of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard versus escalated dose pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: A two-center retrospective cohort study including critically ill patients aged ≥ 18-years with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March 1st, 2020, until January 31st, 2021. Patients who received either Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or Unfractionated heparin 5000 Units three times daily were grouped under the “standard dose VTE prophylaxis and patients who received higher than the standard dose but not as treatment dose were grouped under ”escalated VTE prophylaxis dose“. The primary outcome was the occurance of thrombotic events, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, mortality, and other ICU-related complications. Results: A total of 758 patients were screened; 565 patients were included in the study. We matched 352 patients using propensity score matching (1:1). In patients who received escalated dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, any case of thrombosis and VTE were similar between the two groups (OR 1.22;95 %CI 0.52–2.86; P = 0.64 and OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.16–3.38; P = 0.70 respectively). However, the odds of minor bleeding was higher in patients who received escalated VTE prophylaxis dose (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.08–10.61; P = 0.04). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality nor in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HR 1.17;95 %CI0.79–1.73; P = 0.43 and HR 1.08;95 %CI 0.76–1.53; P = 0.83, respectively). Conclusion: Escalated-dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with thrombosis, or mortality benefits but led to an increased risk of minor bleeding. This study supports previous evidence regarding the optimal dosing VTE pharmacological prophylaxis regimen for critically ill patients with COVID-19. © 2022 The Author(s)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectCritically ill
dc.subjectEnoxaparin
dc.subjectEscalated-dose
dc.subjectHeparin
dc.subjectIntensive Care Units (ICUs)
dc.subjectSARS-Cov-2
dc.subjectStandard dose
dc.subjectVTE prophylaxis
dc.titleComparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers, observational study
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalSaudi Pharmaceutical Journal
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleSaudi Pharmaceutical Journal
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-18T00:03:41Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S1319016422000366-main.pdf
Size:
659.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).