Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDreyer, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorStephen, D.
dc.contributor.authorHuman, R.
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, T.L.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, L.
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, A.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, W.J.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, K.G.F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T00:03:51Z
dc.date.available2022-03-18T00:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationDreyer, A. J., Stephen, D., Human, R., Swanepoel, T. L., Adams, L., O’Neill, A., Jacobs, W. J., & Thomas, K. G. F. (2022). Risky Decision Making Under Stressful Conditions: Men and Women With Smaller Cortisol Elevations Make Riskier Social and Economic Decisions. Frontiers in Psychology.
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810031
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/663652
dc.description.abstractMen often make riskier decisions than women across a wide range of real-life behaviors. Whether this sex difference is accentuated, diminished, or stable under stressful conditions is, however, contested in the scientific literature. A critical blind spot lies amid this contestation: Most studies use standardized, laboratory-based, cognitive measures of decision making rather than complex real-life social simulation tasks to assess risk-related behavior. To address this blind spot, we investigated the effects of acute psychosocial stress on risk decision making in men and women (N = 80) using a standardized cognitive measure (the Iowa Gambling Task; IGT) and a novel task that simulated a real-life social situation (an online chatroom in which participants interacted with other men and women in sexually suggestive scenarios). Participants were exposed to either an acute psychosocial stressor or an equivalent control condition. Stressor-exposed participants were further characterized as high- or low-cortisol responders. Results confirmed that the experimental manipulation was effective. On the IGT, participants characterized as low-cortisol responders (as well as those in the Non-Stress group) made significantly riskier decisions than those characterized as high-cortisol responders. Similarly, in the online chatroom, participants characterized as low-cortisol responders (but not those characterized as high-cortisol responders) were, relative to those in the Non-Stress group, significantly more likely to make risky decisions. Together, these results suggest that at lower levels of cortisol both men and women tend to make riskier decisions in both economic and social spheres. Copyright © 2022 Dreyer, Stephen, Human, Swanepoel, Adams, O'Neill, Jacobs and Thomas.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Dreyer, Stephen, Human, Swanepoel, Adams, O’Neill, Jacobs and Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectchatroom
dc.subjectcortisol
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectsex differences
dc.subjectstress
dc.titleRisky Decision Making Under Stressful Conditions: Men and Women With Smaller Cortisol Elevations Make Riskier Social and Economic Decisions
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentAnxiety Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in Psychology
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-18T00:03:51Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fpsyg-13-810031.pdf
Size:
1.110Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2022 Dreyer, Stephen, Human, Swanepoel, Adams, O’Neill, Jacobs and Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Dreyer, Stephen, Human, Swanepoel, Adams, O’Neill, Jacobs and Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).