Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction
Name:
journal.pcbi.1009222.pdf
Size:
3.278Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
McKnight Brain Institute, University of ArizonaCognitive Science Program, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Public Library of ScienceCitation
Harootonian, S. K., Ekstrom, A. D., & Wilson, R. C. (2022). Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction. PLoS Computational Biology.Journal
PLoS Computational BiologyRights
Copyright © 2022 Harootonian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Successful navigation requires the ability to compute one's location and heading from incoming multisensory information. Previous work has shown that this multisensory input comes in two forms: body-based idiothetic cues, from one's own rotations and translations, and visual allothetic cues, from the environment (usually visual landmarks). However, exactly how these two streams of information are integrated is unclear, with some models suggesting the body-based idiothetic and visual allothetic cues are combined, while others suggest they compete. In this paper we investigated the integration of body-based idiothetic and visual allothetic cues in the computation of heading using virtual reality. In our experiment, participants performed a series of body turns of up to 360 degrees in the dark with only a brief flash (300ms) of visual feedback en route. Because the environment was virtual, we had full control over the visual feedback and were able to vary the offset between this feedback and the true heading angle. By measuring the effect of the feedback offset on the angle participants turned, we were able to determine the extent to which they incorporated visual feedback as a function of the offset error. By further modeling this behavior we were able to quantify the computations people used. While there were considerable individual differences in performance on our task, with some participants mostly ignoring the visual feedback and others relying on it almost entirely, our modeling results suggest that almost all participants used the same strategy in which idiothetic and allothetic cues are combined when the mismatch between them is small, but compete when the mismatch is large. These findings suggest that participants update their estimate of heading using a hybrid strategy that mixes the combination and competition of cues. Copyright: © 2022 Harootonian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Note
Open access journalISSN
1553-734XPubMed ID
35143474Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009222
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Harootonian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Related articles
- Dissociating position and heading estimations: rotated visual orientation cues perceived after walking reset headings but not positions.
- Authors: Mou W, Zhang L
- Issue date: 2014 Dec
- Calibrating space: exploration is important for allothetic and idiothetic navigation.
- Authors: Whishaw IQ, Brooks BL
- Issue date: 1999
- Reference frames in spatial updating when body-based cues are absent.
- Authors: He Q, McNamara TP, Kelly JW
- Issue date: 2018 Jan
- Dead reckoning (path integration) requires the hippocampal formation: evidence from spontaneous exploration and spatial learning tasks in light (allothetic) and dark (idiothetic) tests.
- Authors: Whishaw IQ, Hines DJ, Wallace DG
- Issue date: 2001 Dec 14
- Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment.
- Authors: Zhang L, Mou W
- Issue date: 2019 Feb