Name:
Golish2022_Article_Cross-Instr ...
Size:
2.130Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Golish, D. R.Simon, A. A.
Reuter, D. C.
Ferrone, S.
Clark, B. E.
Li, J.-Y.
DellaGiustina, D. N.
Drouet d’Aubigny, C.
Rizk, B.
Lauretta, D. S.
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022-02-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLCCitation
Golish, D. R., Simon, A. A., Reuter, D. C., Ferrone, S., Clark, B. E., Li, J.-Y., DellaGiustina, D. N., Drouet d’Aubigny, C., Rizk, B., & Lauretta, D. S. (2022). Cross-Instrument Comparison of MapCam and OVIRS on OSIRIS-REx. Space Science Reviews.Journal
Space Science ReviewsRights
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Two of the instruments onboard the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft, the MapCam color imager and the OVIRS visible and infrared spectrometer, observed the surface of asteroid (101955) Bennu in partially overlapping wavelengths. Significant scientific advances have been enabled by using data from these two instruments in tandem, but a robust statistical understanding of their relationship is needed for future analyses to cross-compare their data as accurately and sensitively as possible. Here we present a cross-instrument comparison of data acquired by MapCam and OVIRS, including methods and results for all global and site-specific observation campaigns in which both instruments were active. In our analysis, we consider both the absolute radiometric offset and the relative (normalized) variation between the two instruments; we find that both depend strongly on the photometric and instrumental conditions during the observation. The two instruments have a large absolute offset (>15%) due to their independent radiometric calibrations. However, they are very consistent (relative offset as low as 1%) when each instrument’s response is normalized at a single wavelength, particularly at low phase angles where shadows on Bennu’s rough surface are minimized. We recommend using the global datasets acquired at 12:30 pm local solar time for cross-comparisons; data acquired at higher phase angles have larger uncertainties.Note
Open access articleISSN
0038-6308EISSN
1572-9672Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Aeronautics and Space Administrationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11214-022-00873-8
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.