Physics-informed neural networks for brain hemodynamic predictions using medical imaging
Name:
PINN for brain hemodynamics.pdf
Size:
20.05Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of ArizonaDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-03-23Keywords
4D flow MRIArteries
Blood
Brain hemodynamics
Brain modeling
Computational modeling
Deep neural networks
Hemodynamics
Magnetic resonance imaging
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound
Velocity measurement
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IEEECitation
Sarabian, M., Babaee, H., & Laksari, K. (2022). Physics-informed neural networks for brain hemodynamic predictions using medical imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.Rights
© 2021 IEEECollection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Determining brain hemodynamics plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of various cerebrovascular diseases. In this work, we put forth a physics-informed deep learning framework that augments sparse clinical measurements with one-dimensional (1D) reduced-order model (ROM) simulations to generate physically consistent brain hemodynamic parameters with high spatiotemporal resolution. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound is one of the most common techniques in the current clinical workflow that enables noninvasive and instantaneous evaluation of blood flow velocity within the cerebral arteries. However, it is spatially limited to only a handful of locations across the cerebrovasculature due to the constrained accessibility through the skull’s acoustic windows. Our deep learning framework uses in vivo real-time TCD velocity measurements at several locations in the brain combined with baseline vessel cross-sectional areas acquired from 3D angiography images and provides high-resolution maps of velocity, area, and pressure in the entire brain vasculature. We validate the predictions of our model against in vivo velocity measurements obtained via four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We then showcase the clinical significance of this technique in diagnosing cerebral vasospasm (CVS) by successfully predicting the changes in vasospastic local vessel diameters based on corresponding sparse velocity measurements. We show this capability by generating synthetic blood flow data after cerebral vasospasm at various levels of stenosis. Here, we demonstrate that the physics-based deep learning approach can estimate and quantify the subject-specific cerebral hemodynamic variables with high accuracy despite lacking knowledge of inlet and outlet boundary conditions, which is a significant limitation for the accuracy of the conventional purely physics-based computational models.Note
Immediate accessEISSN
1558-254XPubMed ID
35320090Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1109/TMI.2022.3161653
