Machine learning techniques for chemical and type analysis of ocean oil samples via handheld spectrophotometer device
Name:
1-s2.0-S2590137022000231-main.pdf
Size:
6.446Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdCitation
Sosnowski, K., Loh, A., Zubler, A. V., Shir, H., Ha, S. Y., Yim, U. H., & Yoon, J.-Y. (2022). Machine learning techniques for chemical and type analysis of ocean oil samples via handheld spectrophotometer device. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X.Journal
Biosensors and Bioelectronics: XRights
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We designed and constructed a handheld, sturdy fluorescence spectrometry device for identifying samples from ocean oil spills. Two large training databases of autofluorescence spectra from raw oil samples (538 samples/1614 spectra and 767 samples/2301 spectra) were cross validated using support vector machine (SVM) to identify oil type and SARA (saturate, aromatic, resin, and asphaltene) contents. The device's performance was then validated on an independent set of 79 ocean oil samples, which were added to and then collected from ocean water during outdoor exposure to hot, humid weather to represent an actual oil spill. It successfully classified oil types with 92%–100% sensitivity and specificity and F1 scores of 85.7–100%. Further classification of light fuel oils into marine gas oil (MGO)-like and Bunker A (BA)-like categories was successful with the training set (raw oil samples), while less successful with the independent validation set (ocean oil samples). SARA content classification models performed well in training for the saturate (80.8% accuracy) and asphaltene (90.7%) contents. The developed training model was validated using ocean oil samples, and the resulting accuracies were 62.0% (saturate) and 93.7% (asphaltene). These results indicate the difficulties in classifying volatile light fuel oils with a low molecular weight that have experienced weathering effects, while high molecular weight compounds and general oil type can be analyzed. © 2022 The AuthorsNote
Open access journalISSN
2590-1370Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.biosx.2022.100128
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).