Optimizing a Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors: Study Design and Protocol
Author
Fox, R.S.Gaumond, J.S.
Zee, P.C.
Kaiser, K.
Tanner, E.J.
Ancoli-Israel, S.
Siddique, J.
Penedo, F.J.
Wu, L.M.
Reid, K.J.
Parthasarathy, S.
Badger, T.A.
Rini, C.
Ong, J.C.
Affiliation
Division of Community and Systems Health Science, University of Arizona College of NursingUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona
University of Arizona Health Sciences, Center for Sleep and Circadian Science, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022Keywords
behavioral sleep interventioncancer survivorship
gynecologic cancer
optimization
sleep disturbance
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
Fox, R. S., Gaumond, J. S., Zee, P. C., Kaiser, K., Tanner, E. J., Ancoli-Israel, S., Siddique, J., Penedo, F. J., Wu, L. M., Reid, K. J., Parthasarathy, S., Badger, T. A., Rini, C., & Ong, J. C. (2022). Optimizing a Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors: Study Design and Protocol. Frontiers in Neuroscience.Journal
Frontiers in NeuroscienceRights
Copyright © 2022 Fox, Gaumond, Zee, Kaiser, Tanner, Ancoli-Israel, Siddique, Penedo, Wu, Reid, Parthasarathy, Badger, Rini and Ong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Sleep difficulties, particularly symptoms of insomnia and circadian disruption, are among the primary complaints of gynecologic cancer survivors before, during, and after treatment. Moreover, difficulty sleeping has been linked to poorer health-related quality of life and elevated symptom burden in this population. Although leading behavioral sleep interventions have demonstrated efficacy among cancer survivors, up to 50% of survivors are non-adherent to these treatments, likely because these interventions require labor-intensive behavior and lifestyle changes. Therefore, there is a need for more effective and acceptable approaches to diminish sleep disturbance among cancer survivors. This manuscript describes the methodology of a two-part study guided by the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework to identify a streamlined behavioral sleep intervention for gynecologic cancer survivors. Three candidate intervention components previously shown to decrease sleep disturbance will be evaluated, including sleep restriction, stimulus control, and systematic bright light exposure. Participants will be adult women with a history of non-metastatic gynecologic cancer who have completed primary treatment and who report current poor sleep quality. Fifteen participants will be recruited for Part 1 of the study, which will utilize qualitative methods to identify barriers to and facilitators of intervention adherence. Results will inform changes to the delivery of the candidate intervention components to promote adherence in Part 2, where 80 participants will be recruited and randomized to one of eight conditions reflecting every possible combination of the three candidate intervention components in a full factorial design. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-months post-intervention. Part 2 results will identify the combination of candidate intervention components that yields the most efficacious yet efficient 6-week intervention for diminishing sleep disturbance. This is the first known study to apply the MOST framework to optimize a behavioral sleep intervention and will yield a resource-efficient treatment to diminish sleep disturbance, improve health-related quality of life, and decrease symptom burden among gynecologic cancer survivors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05044975. Copyright © 2022 Fox, Gaumond, Zee, Kaiser, Tanner, Ancoli-Israel, Siddique, Penedo, Wu, Reid, Parthasarathy, Badger, Rini and Ong.Note
Open access journalISSN
1662-4548Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fnins.2022.818718
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Fox, Gaumond, Zee, Kaiser, Tanner, Ancoli-Israel, Siddique, Penedo, Wu, Reid, Parthasarathy, Badger, Rini and Ong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).