Diagnostic Value, Prognostic Value, and Immune Infiltration of LOX Family Members in Liver Cancer: Bioinformatic Analysis
Author
Sun, C.Ma, S.
Chen, Y.
Kim, N.H.
Kailas, S.
Wang, Y.
Gu, W.
Chen, Y.
Tuason, J.P.W.
Bhan, C.
Manem, N.
Huang, Y.
Cheng, C.
Zhou, Z.
Zhou, Q.
Zhu, Y.
Affiliation
College of Medicine, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
bioinformatic analysisimmune infiltration
liver cancer
lysyl oxidase
nomogram
prognostic value
receiver operating curve
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
Sun, C., Ma, S., Chen, Y., Kim, N. H., Kailas, S., Wang, Y., Gu, W., Chen, Y., Tuason, J. P. W., Bhan, C., Manem, N., Huang, Y., Cheng, C., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Diagnostic Value, Prognostic Value, and Immune Infiltration of LOX Family Members in Liver Cancer: Bioinformatic Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology.Journal
Frontiers in OncologyRights
Copyright © 2022 Sun, Ma, Chen, Kim, Kailas, Wang, Gu, Chen, Tuason, Bhan, Manem, Huang, Cheng, Zhou, Zhou and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Liver cancer (LC) is well known for its prevalence as well as its poor prognosis. The aberrant expression of lysyl oxidase (LOX) family is associated with liver cancer, but their function and prognostic value in LC remain largely unclear. This study aimed to explore the function and prognostic value of LOX family in LC through bioinformatics analysis and meta-analysis. Results: The expression levels of all LOX family members were significantly increased in LC. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of LOXL2 was 0.946 with positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.994. LOX and LOXL3 were correlated with worse prognosis. Meta-analysis also validated effect of LOX on prognosis. Nomogram of these two genes and other predictors was also plotted. There was insufficient data from original studies to conduct meta-analysis on LOXL3. The functions of LOX family members in LC were mostly involved in extracellular and functions and structures. The expressions of LOX family members strongly correlated with various immune infiltrating cells and immunomodulators in LC. Conclusions: For LC patients, LOXL2 may be a potential diagnostic biomarker, while LOX and LOXL3 have potential prognostic and therapeutic values. Positive correlation between LOX family and infiltration of various immune cells and immunomodulators suggests the need for exploration of their roles in the tumor microenvironment and for potential immunotherapeutic to target LOX family proteins. Copyright © 2022 Sun, Ma, Chen, Kim, Kailas, Wang, Gu, Chen, Tuason, Bhan, Manem, Huang, Cheng, Zhou, Zhou and Zhu.Note
Open access journalISSN
2234-943XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fonc.2022.843880
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Sun, Ma, Chen, Kim, Kailas, Wang, Gu, Chen, Tuason, Bhan, Manem, Huang, Cheng, Zhou, Zhou and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).