Name:
respectful-terminology-in-arch ...
Size:
508.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Arizona State Museum, University of ArizonaSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Cambridge University PressCitation
Watson, J. T., Young, A. J., Garcia-Lewis, A., Lucas, C., & Plummer, S. (2022). Respectful Terminology in Archaeological Compliance. Advances in Archaeological Practice.Rights
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Archaeological compliance is defined by state and federal legislation and the constrained, precise language in which it is written. Rules and policies operationalize the law but provide some flexibility in its interpretation and implementation. The pronounced use of "legal"and "scientific"language in archaeological compliance can be considered insensitive or offensive to some tribal members when discussing the disposition and care of the remains and belongings of their ancestors. The language we use constructs our reality and defines how we interpret our interactions of the lived experience. It is therefore necessary to revise the language employed in archaeological compliance to ensure that it reflects the values of the communities that these laws define to determine treatment and ultimate disposition of their ancestral remains and belongings. This article describes and encourages the use of a respectful terminology, developed in conjunction with compliance professionals and tribal representatives, to restructure the language we use and redefine our interactions as more considerate of tribal concerns for repatriation. Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology.Note
Open access journalISSN
2326-3768Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/aap.2021.47
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).