Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
Affiliation
Visual Perception Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of ArizonaCognitive Science Program, School of Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022Keywords
figure assignmentobject detection
semantic conflict
semantic network
semantics
superordinate-level category
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Skocypec, R. M., & Peterson, M. A. (2022). Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms. Vision (Switzerland).Journal
Vision (Switzerland)Rights
Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Recent evidence suggesting that object detection is improved following valid rather than invalid labels implies that semantics influence object detection. It is not clear, however, whether the results index object detection or feature detection. Further, because control conditions were absent and labels and objects were repeated multiple times, the mechanisms are unknown. We assessed object detection via figure assignment, whereby objects are segmented from backgrounds. Masked bipartite displays depicting a portion of a mono-oriented object (a familiar configuration) on one side of a central border were shown once only for 90 or 100 ms. Familiar configuration is a figural prior. Accurate detection was indexed by reports of an object on the familiar configuration side of the border. Compared to control experiments without labels, valid labels improved accuracy and reduced response times (RTs) more for upright than inverted objects (Studies 1 and 2). Invalid labels denoting different superordinate-level objects (DSC; Study 1) or same superordinate-level objects (SSC; Study 2) reduced accuracy for upright displays only. Orientation dependency indicates that effects are mediated by activated object representations rather than features which are invariant over orientation. Following invalid SSC labels (Study 2), accurate detection RTs were longer than control for both orientations, implicating conflict between semantic representations that had to be resolved before object detection. These results demonstrate that object detection is not just affected by semantics, it entails semantics. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Note
Open access journalISSN
2411-5150Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/vision6010019
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).