BASH-GN: A new machine learning–derived questionnaire for screening obstructive sleep apnea
Affiliation
Biomedical Engineering, The University of ArizonaAsthma and Airway Disease Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Arizona
BIO5 Institute, The University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-04-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLCCitation
Huo, J., Quan, S. F., Roveda, J., & Li, A. (2022). BASH-GN: A new machine learning–derived questionnaire for screening obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep and Breathing.Journal
Sleep and BreathingRights
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a machine learning–based questionnaire (BASH-GN) to classify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk by considering risk factor subtypes. Methods: Participants who met study inclusion criteria were selected from the Sleep Heart Health Study Visit 1 (SHHS 1) database. Other participants from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort (WSC) served as an independent test dataset. Participants with an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h were considered as high risk for OSA. Potential risk factors were ranked using mutual information between each factor and the AHI, and only the top 50% were selected. We classified the subjects into 2 different groups, low and high phenotype groups, according to their risk scores. We then developed the BASH-GN, a machine learning–based questionnaire that consists of two logistic regression classifiers for the 2 different subtypes of OSA risk prediction. Results: We evaluated the BASH-GN on the SHHS 1 test set (n = 1237) and WSC set (n = 1120) and compared its performance with four commonly used OSA screening questionnaires, the Four-Variable, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin, and STOP-BANG. The model outperformed these questionnaires on both test sets regarding the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The model achieved AUROC (SHHS 1: 0.78, WSC: 0.76) and AUPRC (SHHS 1: 0.72, WSC: 0.74), respectively. The questionnaire is available at https://c2ship.org/bash-gn. Conclusion: Considering OSA subtypes when evaluating OSA risk may improve the accuracy of OSA screening.Note
12 month embargo; published: 28 April 2022ISSN
1520-9512EISSN
1522-1709Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11325-022-02629-8