Quantifying Late Pleistocene to Holocene Erosion Rates in the Hami Basin, China: Insights Into Pleistocene Dust Dynamics of an East Asian Stony Desert
Name:
Geophysical Research Letters - ...
Size:
2.302Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Geosciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Zhang, D., Wang, G., Abell, J. T., Pullen, A., Winckler, G., Schaefer, J. M., & Shen, T. (2022). Quantifying Late Pleistocene to Holocene Erosion Rates in the Hami Basin, China: Insights Into Pleistocene Dust Dynamics of an East Asian Stony Desert. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(8).Journal
Geophysical Research LettersRights
© 2022 American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Wind is one of the major processes modifying the land surface in the Hami Basin, as evidenced by wind deflation gravel lags, yardangs, and gravel mantled eolian ripples. We report erosion rates for the Hami Basin using cosmogenic 10Be measurements. Bedrock erosion rates average 0.121 ± 0.0293 mm yr−1, which is similar to those of other wind-eroded arid basins in East Asia, but is anomalously low when modern near-surface wind speeds are considered. We posit that interglacial periods experienced lower erosion rates than glacial periods, and that the Hami Basin was likely once a larger dust producer than at present, with Pleistocene dust emissions driven by the eolian deflation of alluvial terrace deposits as well as bedrock weathering and abrasion. Wind erosion and dust production in the Hami Basin was largely regulated by the synoptically controlled spatial-temporal distribution of precipitation and subsequent landscape evolution since at least the late Pleistocene. © 2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Note
6 month embargo; first published: 06 April 2022ISSN
0094-8276Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2021GL097495