Impaired Affordance Perception as the Basis of Tool Use Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease
Name:
healthcare-10-00839-v2.pdf
Size:
1.483Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
College of Nursing, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
affordancealternative tool use
Alzheimer’s disease
apraxia of tool use
go/no-go task
preclinical stage
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Kim, N.-G., Effken, J. A., & Lee, H.-W. (2022). Impaired Affordance Perception as the Basis of Tool Use Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(5).Journal
Healthcare (Switzerland)Rights
Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The present study investigated whether defective affordance perception capacity underpins tool use deficits in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). An affordance, a concept James Gibson introduced, scales environmental objects to an animal’s action capabilities, thus offering opportunities for action. Each man-made artifact carries both a primary affordance (its designed function) and secondary affordances. In Experiment 1, participants identified secondary affordances of objects as a measure of their ability to identify alternative uses of familiar tools. A single response Go/No-Go task was administered to 4 groups: AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and elderly controls (EC). Groups were matched for age and years of education. The AD group performed poorest, followed by MCI, and PD and EC. EC and PD groups’ results failed to reach statistical significance, and the AD group performed at chance. In Experiment 2, participants judged the physical properties of the same objects used in Experiment 1. Even AD patients performed reliably, ruling out a visual processing deficit as the basis for their poor performance in Experiment 1. Results suggest that degraded affordance detection capacity can differentiate AD from normal aging and other neurodegenerative disorders and could be an affordable marker for AD, even in the early stages of AD. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Note
Open access journalISSN
2227-9032Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/healthcare10050839
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).