Using Dyadic Observation to Explore Equitable Learning Opportunities in Classroom Instruction [Usando a observação diádica para explorar oportunidades de aprendizagem equitativas na instrução em sala de aula] [Usar la observación diádica para explorar oportunidades de aprendizaje equitativas en la instrucción en el aula]
Affiliation
University of Arizona, Department of Educational PsychologyIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Arizona State UniversityCitation
Lavigne, A. L., & Good, T. L. (2021). Using Dyadic Observation to Explore Equitable Learning Opportunities in Classroom Instruction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(149).Rights
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Because of poverty, many children do not receive adequate prenatal care, nutrition, or early childhood education. These inequities combine to ensure that many students enter school with considerably less academic content knowledge and skills for learning than their peers. Teachers and schools did not create these gaps, but they must address them. The impact of schools in reducing gaps has been explored for decades only to yield inconsistent findings. One possible reason for these contradictory results is because these studies ignore classroom process. We argue for the inclusion of process in research on opportunity and achievement gaps to better articulate if schools provide inequitable learning opportunities. Further, we argue for dyadic (teacher to individual student) measurement of classroom process because commonly-used observation instruments only measure teachers’ interactions with the whole class. These instruments obscure differential teacher treatment that may exist in some classrooms. To improve policy and practice, we call for supplementing extant measures of teachers’ whole-class interactions (process) and student outcome (product) measures with those that measure dyadic interactions to learn how opportunities to learn in classrooms and schools are distributed among students to reduce, sustain, or enhance learning gaps. © 2021, Arizona State University. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
1068-2341Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.14507/epaa.29.6954
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.