Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group
Name:
PIIS266650182200109X.pdf
Size:
2.946Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Vijayaraman, P.Cano, O.
Ponnusamy, S.S.
Molina-Lerma, M.
Chan, J.Y.S.
Padala, S.K.
Sharma, P.S.
Whinnett, Z.I.
Herweg, B.
Upadhyay, G.A.
Subzposh, F.A.
Patel, N.R.
Beer, D.A.
Bednarek, A.
Kielbasa, G.
Tung, R.
Ellenbogen, K.A.
Jastrzebski, M.
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
Cardiac resynchronization therapyCardiomyopathy
Heart failure
Left bundle branch area pacing
Right bundle branch block
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
Vijayaraman, P., Cano, O., Ponnusamy, S. S., Molina-Lerma, M., Chan, J. Y. S., Padala, S. K., Sharma, P. S., Whinnett, Z. I., Herweg, B., Upadhyay, G. A., Subzposh, F. A., Patel, N. R., Beer, D. A., Bednarek, A., Kielbasa, G., Tung, R., Ellenbogen, K. A., & Jastrzebski, M. (2022). Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group. Heart Rhythm O2.Journal
Heart Rhythm O2Rights
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option. Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing. Methods: LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed. Results: LBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V6 of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response. Conclusion: LBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction. © 2022 Heart Rhythm SocietyNote
Open access journalISSN
2666-5018Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.