Bumpy Declining Light Curves Are Common in Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae
Name:
Hosseinzadeh_2022_ApJ_933_14.pdf
Size:
1.761Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Hosseinzadeh, G., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D., Gomez, S., Nicholl, M., & Blanchard, P. (2022). Bumpy Declining Light Curves Are Common in Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. Astrophysical Journal, 933(1).Journal
Astrophysical JournalRights
Copyright © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Recent work has revealed that the light curves of hydrogen-poor (Type I) superluminous supernovae (SLSNe), thought to be powered by magnetar central engines, do not always follow the smooth decline predicted by a simple magnetar spin-down model. Here we present the first systematic study of the prevalence and properties of "bumps"in the post-peak light curves of 34 SLSNe. We find that the majority (44%-76%) of events cannot be explained by a smooth magnetar model alone. We do not find any difference in supernova properties between events with and without bumps. By fitting a simple Gaussian model to the light-curve residuals, we characterize each bump with an amplitude, temperature, phase, and duration. We find that most bumps correspond with an increase in the photospheric temperature of the ejecta, although we do not see drastic changes in spectroscopic features during the bump. We also find a moderate correlation (ρ ≈ 0.5; p ≈ 0.01) between the phase of the bumps and the rise time, implying that such bumps tend to happen at a certain "evolutionary phase,"(3.7 ± 1.4)t rise. Most bumps are consistent with having diffused from a central source of variable luminosity, although sources further out in the ejecta are not excluded. With this evidence, we explore whether the cause of these bumps is intrinsic to the supernova (e.g., a variable central engine) or extrinsic (e.g., circumstellar interaction). Both cases are plausible, requiring low-level variability in the magnetar input luminosity, small decreases in the ejecta opacity, or a thin circumstellar shell or disk. © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-637XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/ac67dd
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.