The impact of sampling strategy on the cloud droplet number concentration estimated from satellite data
AffiliationDepartment of Chemical And Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona
MetadataShow full item record
CitationGryspeerdt, E., McCoy, D. T., Crosbie, E., Moore, R. H., Nott, G. J., Painemal, D., Small-Griswold, J., Sorooshian, A., & Ziemba, L. (2022). The impact of sampling strategy on the cloud droplet number concentration estimated from satellite data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15(12), 3875–3892.
RightsCopyright © Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractCloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central importance to observation-based estimates of aerosol indirect effects, being used to quantify both the cloud sensitivity to aerosol and the base state of the cloud. However, the derivation of Nd from satellite data depends on a number of assumptions about the cloud and the accuracy of the retrievals of the cloud properties from which it is derived, making it prone to systematic biases. A number of sampling strategies have been proposed to address these biases by selecting the most accurate Nd retrievals in the satellite data. This work compares the impact of these strategies on the accuracy of the satellite retrieved Nd, using a selection of in situ measurements. In stratocumulus regions, the MODIS Nd retrieval is able to achieve a high precision (r2 of 0.5-0.8). This is lower in other cloud regimes but can be increased by appropriate sampling choices. Although the Nd sampling can have significant effects on the Nd climatology, it produces only a 20% variation in the implied radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions, with the choice of aerosol proxy driving the overall uncertainty. The results are summarised into recommendations for using MODIS Nd products and appropriate sampling. © 2022 Edward Gryspeerdt et al.
NoteOpen access journal
VersionFinal published version
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.