Effects of a Behavioral Intervention with Foster Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Author
Platt, Christine RaeIssue Date
2022Keywords
Behavioral InterventionCaregiving
Family Nursing
Foster care
Randomized Controlled Trial
Siblings
Advisor
Gephart, Sheila
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Embargo
Release after 08/02/2024Abstract
Background: Children in foster care are highly vulnerable populations with poor health outcomes. Key protective factor is having a safe, consistent environment in which to adapt and heal from past traumas, which often comes in form of consistent and nurturing foster homes. Study Aims: Current study is aimed to investigate technology delivered family (sibling inclusive) intervention titled The Connected Family Series – For Foster Families. Emphasis was on increasing family hardiness, preparation to care for children in foster care particularly those with disabilities and special needs. Aims included: (1) establish feasibility of technology-based intervention, (2) explore effects of intervention on stress and relational quality outcomes among family member participants, and (3) determine feasibility of in-home saliva collection to assess diurnal cortisol rhythm (objective, stress-related physiological outcome). Methods: This study employed randomized control trial design of behavioral interventions. Stress and relational quality outcomes among members were measured (pre- and post- intervention) using concepts of family hardiness, preparedness, and relationship development through self-report questionnaire which included Family Hardiness Index (FHI), portions of Casey Foster Applicant Inventory (CFAI), and Sibling Inventory of Behavior (SIB), respectively. Additionally, objective indicators of stress-related biology, saliva diurnal cortisol rhythm was measured before intervention, after completion of intervention, and 1-month post intervention over course of a day, for three consecutive days at each time point. Results: The Connected Family Series intervention was successfully adapted for foster families. Families in intervention group (n= 59 dyads) participated in online videos and activities at rate of 78% for those who stayed in study. Statistically significant increases in family hardiness in intervention group (p<0.001, Cohen’s d=0.97) compared to control group. Measures of positive sibling relationship scores also increased significantly in intervention group compared to control group (p<0.002, Cohen’s d=0.76), accounting for approximately 32% of increase in FHI score. Salivary collection to assess diurnal cortisol rhythm was found challenging, but possible within population before and after intervention. Discussion: Providing fostering families an online behavioral intervention increased sibling and foster child relationships and improved overall family functioning. Future research should focus on long-term impact possibly on placement stability and outcomes for children in foster care.Type
textElectronic Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Graduate CollegeNursing