Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChristiano, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHlohinec, Dillon Lukas
dc.creatorHlohinec, Dillon Lukas
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T02:37:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-24T02:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHlohinec, Dillon Lukas. (2022). THE GAMIFICATION OF DEMOCRACY: GAMES, DEMOCRACY, AND DELIBERATIVE PROCEDURALISM (Bachelor's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/665771
dc.description.abstractWhat are games? What is democracy? Why is it important that democracy is not a game? This paper hopes to answer those questions. Games give us clear and precise worlds to be a part of for just a few moments. Democracy allows the people to select and hold accountable their government. Relying on the work of C. Thi Nguyen to discuss games and Joseph Schumpeter to discuss democracy, I argue that we ought not to treat democracy as a game. I suggest that Schumpeter portrays democracy as democracy gamified and offer reasons for why this is bad. Nguyen’s work can help us understand the problems of gamification and why we should avoid gamifying vast parts of our lives. After discussing what is good about games and what is bad about gamified democracy, I end with a version of democracy that resists gamification and rejects Schumpeter's definition of democracy. I offer deliberative proceduralism as a form of democracy that resists the simplifications of gamified democracy and asks us to treat democracy as the serious and impactful subject that is it.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.titleTHE GAMIFICATION OF DEMOCRACY: GAMES, DEMOCRACY, AND DELIBERATIVE PROCEDURALISM
dc.typeElectronic Thesis
dc.typetext
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizona
thesis.degree.levelbachelors
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophy, Politics, Economics, and Law
thesis.degree.disciplineHonors College
thesis.degree.nameB.A.
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-24T02:37:40Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_hr_2022_0051_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
179.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record