Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRauschert, C.
dc.contributor.authorSeitz, N.-N.
dc.contributor.authorOlderbak, S.
dc.contributor.authorPogarell, O.
dc.contributor.authorDreischulte, T.
dc.contributor.authorKraus, L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T00:52:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T00:52:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationRauschert, C., Seitz, N.-N., Olderbak, S., Pogarell, O., Dreischulte, T., & Kraus, L. (2022). Subtypes in Patients Taking Prescribed Opioid Analgesics and Their Characteristics: A Latent Class Analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2022.918371
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/665943
dc.description.abstractBackground: Owing to their pharmacological properties the use of opioid analgesics carries a risk of abuse and dependence, which are associated with a wide range of personal, social, and medical problems. Data-based approaches for identifying distinct patient subtypes at risk for prescription opioid use disorder in Germany are lacking. Objective: This study aimed to identify distinct subgroups of patients using prescribed opioid analgesics at risk for prescription opioid use disorder. Methods: Latent class analysis was applied to pooled data from the 2015 and 2021 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse. Participants were aged 18–64 years and self-reported the use of prescribed opioid analgesics in the last year (n = 503). Seven class-defining variables based on behavioral, mental, and physical health characteristics commonly associated with problematic opioid use were used to identify participant subtypes. Statistical tests were performed to examine differences between the participant subtypes on sociodemographic variables and prescription opioid use disorder. Results: Three classes were extracted, which were labeled as poor mental health group (43.0%, n = 203), polysubstance group (10.4%, n = 50), and relatively healthy group (46.6%, n = 250). Individuals within the poor mental health group (23.2%, n = 43) and the polysubstance group (31.1%, n = 13) showed a higher prevalence of prescription opioid use disorder compared to those of the relatively healthy group. Conclusion: The results add further evidence to the knowledge that patients using prescribed opioid analgesics are not a homogeneous group of individuals whose needs lie in pain management alone. Rather, it becomes clear that these patients differ in their individual risk of a prescription opioid use disorder, and therefore identification of specific risks plays an important role in early prevention. Copyright © 2022 Rauschert, Seitz, Olderbak, Pogarell, Dreischulte and Kraus.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Rauschert, Seitz, Olderbak, Pogarell, Dreischulte and Kraus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDSM-5
dc.subjectepidemiological survey
dc.subjectlatent class analysis
dc.subjectopioid analgesics
dc.subjectopioid use disorder
dc.subjectprescription
dc.titleSubtypes in Patients Taking Prescribed Opioid Analgesics and Their Characteristics: A Latent Class Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Psychiatry
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in Psychiatry
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-25T00:52:09Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fpsyt-13-918371.pdf
Size:
513.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2022 Rauschert, Seitz, Olderbak, Pogarell, Dreischulte and Kraus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Rauschert, Seitz, Olderbak, Pogarell, Dreischulte and Kraus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).