Name:
s41534-022-00596-2.pdf
Size:
1.304Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of ArizonaDepartment of Physics, University of Arizona
James C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Nature ResearchCitation
Zhang, B., Sone, A., & Zhuang, Q. (2022). Quantum computational phase transition in combinatorial problems. Npj Quantum Information, 8(1).Journal
npj Quantum InformationRights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Quantum Approximate Optimization algorithm (QAOA) aims to search for approximate solutions to discrete optimization problems with near-term quantum computers. As there are no algorithmic guarantee possible for QAOA to outperform classical computers, without a proof that bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) ≠ nondeterministic polynomial time (NP), it is necessary to investigate the empirical advantages of QAOA. We identify a computational phase transition of QAOA when solving hard problems such as SAT—random instances are most difficult to train at a critical problem density. We connect the transition to the controllability and the complexity of QAOA circuits. Moreover, we find that the critical problem density in general deviates from the SAT-UNSAT phase transition, where the hardest instances for classical algorithms lies. Then, we show that the high problem density region, which limits QAOA’s performance in hard optimization problems (reachability deficits), is actually a good place to utilize QAOA: its approximation ratio has a much slower decay with the problem density, compared to classical approximate algorithms. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that quantum advantages of QAOA over classical approximate algorithms can be identified. © 2022, The Author(s).Note
Open access journalISSN
2056-6387Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41534-022-00596-2
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

