The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, B.
dc.contributor.authorSone, A.
dc.contributor.authorZhuang, Q.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T00:52:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T00:52:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationZhang, B., Sone, A., & Zhuang, Q. (2022). Quantum computational phase transition in combinatorial problems. Npj Quantum Information, 8(1).
dc.identifier.issn2056-6387
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41534-022-00596-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/665955
dc.description.abstractQuantum Approximate Optimization algorithm (QAOA) aims to search for approximate solutions to discrete optimization problems with near-term quantum computers. As there are no algorithmic guarantee possible for QAOA to outperform classical computers, without a proof that bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) ≠ nondeterministic polynomial time (NP), it is necessary to investigate the empirical advantages of QAOA. We identify a computational phase transition of QAOA when solving hard problems such as SAT—random instances are most difficult to train at a critical problem density. We connect the transition to the controllability and the complexity of QAOA circuits. Moreover, we find that the critical problem density in general deviates from the SAT-UNSAT phase transition, where the hardest instances for classical algorithms lies. Then, we show that the high problem density region, which limits QAOA’s performance in hard optimization problems (reachability deficits), is actually a good place to utilize QAOA: its approximation ratio has a much slower decay with the problem density, compared to classical approximate algorithms. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that quantum advantages of QAOA over classical approximate algorithms can be identified. © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleQuantum computational phase transition in combinatorial problems
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physics, University of Arizona
dc.contributor.departmentJames C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalnpj Quantum Information
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitlenpj Quantum Information
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-25T00:52:15Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s41534-022-00596-2.pdf
Size:
1.304Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.