BLM Sumoylation Is Required for Replication Stability and Normal Fork Velocity During DNA Replication
Affiliation
University of Arizona, Cancer Center, University of ArizonaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
de Renty, C., Pond, K. W., Yagle, M. K., & Ellis, N. A. (2022). BLM Sumoylation Is Required for Replication Stability and Normal Fork Velocity During DNA Replication. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9.Rights
Copyright © 2022 de Renty, Pond, Yagle and Ellis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BLM is sumoylated in response to replication stress. We have studied the role of BLM sumoylation in physiologically normal and replication-stressed conditions by expressing in BLM-deficient cells a BLM with SUMO acceptor-site mutations, which we refer to as SUMO-mutant BLM cells. SUMO-mutant BLM cells exhibited multiple defects in both stressed and unstressed DNA replication conditions, including, in hydroxyurea-treated cells, reduced fork restart and increased fork collapse and, in untreated cells, slower fork velocity and increased fork instability as assayed by track-length asymmetry. We further showed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching that SUMO-mutant BLM protein was less dynamic than normal BLM and comprised a higher immobile fraction at collapsed replication forks. BLM sumoylation has previously been linked to the recruitment of RAD51 to stressed forks in hydroxyurea-treated cells. An important unresolved question is whether the failure to efficiently recruit RAD51 is the explanation for replication stress in untreated SUMO-mutant BLM cells. Copyright © 2022 de Renty, Pond, Yagle and Ellis.Note
Open access journalISSN
2296-889XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fmolb.2022.875102
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 de Renty, Pond, Yagle and Ellis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).