Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOuyed, A.
dc.contributor.authorZeng, X.
dc.contributor.authorWu, L.
dc.contributor.authorPosselt, D.
dc.contributor.authorSu, H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T22:18:11Z
dc.date.available2022-09-08T22:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationOuyed, A., Zeng, X., Wu, L., Posselt, D., & Su, H. (2021). Two-Stage Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Calculating Moisture-Tracking Atmospheric Motion Vectors. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(12), 1671–1684.
dc.identifier.issn1558-8424
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0070.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/666055
dc.description.abstractMuch of the errors of atmospheric motion vectors (AMV) may be a consequence of algorithms not incor-porating dynamical information. A physics-informed, artificial intelligence algorithm was developed that corrects errors of moisture tracking AMV (from the movement of water vapor) using numerical weather prediction (NWP) fields. The University of Arizona (UA) algorithm uses a variational method as a first step (fsUA); the second step then filters the first-stage AMVs using a random forest model that learns the error correction from NWP fields. The UA algorithm is compared with a traditional image feature tracking algorithm (JPL) using a global nature run as the “ground truth.” Experiments use global all-sky humidity fields at 500 and 850 hPa for 1–3 January 2006 and 1–3 July 2006. UA outputs AMVs with root-mean-square vector differences (RMSVDs) of 2 m s-1 for the tropics and ∼2–3 ms-1 for midlatitudes and the poles, whereas JPL outputs much higher RMSVDs of ∼3 ms-1 for the tropics and ∼3–9 ms-1 for the midlatitudes and poles. Although the algorithm fsUA produces approximately the same global RMSVDs as the JPL algorithm, fsUA has a higher resolution since it outputs an AMV per pixel, whereas the JPL algorithm uses a target box that effectively smooths the vec-tors. Furthermore, UA’s RMSVDs are lower than the intrinsic error (calculated from the differences between two reanaly-sis datasets). Even for error-prone regions with low moisture gradients and where winds are oriented along moisture isolines, UA’s absolute speed difference with “truth” stays within ∼3ms-1. © 2021 American Meteorological Society.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 American Meteorological Society.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectCloud tracking/cloud motion winds
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.titleTwo-Stage Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Calculating Moisture-Tracking Atmospheric Motion Vectors
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
dc.description.note6 month embargo; published online: 04 January 2022
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
refterms.dateFOA2022-07-04T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Two-Stage Artificial Intelligence ...
Size:
2.177Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record