• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Science Operations Planning and Implementation for the OSIRIS-REx Mission, Part 1: Process

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    IEEE_Aerospace_2022_OSIRIS-REx ...
    Size:
    2.114Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Author
    Polit, Anjani T.
    Balram-Knutson, Sara S.
    Audi, Edward
    Becker, Tammy
    Boynton, William V.
    Dean, David
    Drozd, Kristofer
    Enos, Heather L.
    Fitzgibbon, Michael
    Galinsky, Ingrid
    Garcia, Rose
    Gardner, Andrew
    Harshman, Karl
    Hergenrother, Carl W.
    Kidd, John N.
    Lambert, Diane
    Nelson, Joshua V.
    Selznick, Sanford
    Westermann, Mathilde M.
    Zeszut, Zoe
    Lauretta, Dante S.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona
    Issue Date
    2022-03-05
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    IEEE
    Citation
    Polit, A. T., Balram-Knutson, S. S., Audi, E., Becker, T., Boynton, W. V., Dean, D., Drozd, K., Enos, H. L., Fitzgibbon, M., Galinsky, I., Garcia, R., Gardner, A., Harshman, K., Hergenrother, C. W., Kidd, J. N., Lambert, D., Nelson, J. V., Selznick, S., Westermann, M. M., … Lauretta, D. S. (2022). Science Operations Planning and Implementation for the OSIRIS-REx Mission, Part 1: Process. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2022-March.
    Journal
    IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings
    Rights
    © 2022 IEEE.
    Collection Information
    This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
    Abstract
    The Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) spacecraft arrived at the near-Earth asteroid (101955) Bennu in December 2018 and executed a science observation campaign to comprehensively characterize the asteroid. Proximity operations at Bennu included orbital phases and flyby phases with various viewing geometries and altitudes. The complexity of the mission plan, integrated instrument operations, and the challenges of spacecraft navigation in the microgravity environment required an intricate planning and implementation process that included participation and coordination among all mission elements. The Science Planning Team (SPT) and the Implementation Team (IpT) at the University of Arizona planned and implemented all science and most optical navigation observations. Prior to the formal planning process, science requirements were mapped to mission phases and observation geometry constraints. During development of the mission phases, the navigation team produced a spacecraft trajectory, and the SPT developed the pointing and attitude profile to meet the specified constraints. In the strategic planning process, which began three months prior to execution, the SPT conducted sensitivity analysis of the observation designs against a set of perturbed trajectories delivered by the navigation team to ensure that they were robust to navigational uncertainties. Planning of the specific observations to occur within each phase was divided into units of weeks, and the plans for each week were developed and implemented on a rolling eight-week tactical planning and implementation cycle, ending with execution and data downlink. This cycle included a standardized schedule of activities and gateways to ensure that every observation plan underwent a full suite of analysis, verification, and approval in the allocated timeframe. Checklists guided the SPT and IpT through the build and verification process to confirm plan safety and fidelity. The SPT led the first four weeks of the tactical process, with participation from the IpT and other stakeholders. During the first two weeks, the SPT gathered information from stakeholders, conducted preliminary planning to confirm the science observations were feasible and obeyed spacecraft constraints, and determined how to integrate instrument commanding with the spacecraft pointing profile. The SPT started the final observation design and planning six weeks prior to execution. Once complete, plan walkthroughs were conducted with stakeholders, which culminated in a go/no-go decision to proceed with implementation at the four-week point. In the last four weeks of the tactical planning and implementation process, the IpT led the final processing of science plans with participation from stakeholders. The IpT compiled the plans, performed comprehensive safety checks against established spacecraft and instrument flight rules, and generated flight products and artifacts. After IpT delivered the flight products, the spacecraft team integrated them with the spacecraft sequencing, performed ground testing, and produced an integrated report. IpT reviewed the report, verifying instrument health and safety and confirming nominal plan execution in the ground simulation. The final flight products were uplinked to the spacecraft a few days prior to the execution week. During execution, the IpT and other stakeholders monitored instrument performance and viewed science and navigation data. Resulting science data products were used for operational decisions and science investigations.
    Note
    Immediate access
    ISSN
    1095-323X
    DOI
    10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843197
    Version
    Final accepted manuscript
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843197
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.