Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, K.S.
dc.contributor.authorNatarajan, B.
dc.contributor.authorWong, W.X.
dc.contributor.authorYousman, W.
dc.contributor.authorKoester, S.
dc.contributor.authorNyotowidjojo, I.
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.Z.
dc.contributor.authorKern, K.B.
dc.contributor.authorAcharya, D.
dc.contributor.authorFortuin, D.
dc.contributor.authorHung, O.
dc.contributor.authorVoelker, W.
dc.contributor.authorIndik, J.H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T01:07:51Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T01:07:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLee, K. S., Natarajan, B., Wong, W. X., Yousman, W., Koester, S., Nyotowidjojo, I., Lee, J. Z., Kern, K. B., Acharya, D., Fortuin, D., Hung, O., Voelker, W., & Indik, J. H. (2022). A randomized controlled trial of simulation training in teaching coronary angiographic views. BMC Medical Education, 22(1).
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.pmid36028807
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-022-03705-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/666341
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Simulation technology has an established role in teaching technical skills to cardiology fellows, but its impact on teaching trainees to interpret coronary angiographic (CA) images has not been systematically studied. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to test whether structured simulation training, in addition to traditional methods would improve CA image interpretation skills in a heterogeneous group of medical trainees. Methods: We prospectively randomized a convenience sample of 105 subjects comprising of medical students (N = 20), residents (N = 68) and fellows (N = 17) from the University of Arizona. Subjects were randomized in a stratified fashion into a simulation training group which received simulation training in addition to didactic teaching (n = 53) and a control training group which received didactic teaching alone (n = 52). The change in pre and post-test score (delta score) was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA for education status and training arm. Results: Subjects improved in their post-test scores with a mean change of 4.6 ± 4.0 points. Subjects in the simulation training arm had a higher delta score compared to control (5.4 ± 4.2 versus 3.8 ± 3.7, p = 0.04), with greatest impact for residents (6.6 ± 4.0 versus 3.5 ± 3.4) with a p = 0.02 for interaction of training arm and education status. Conclusions: Simulation training complements traditional methods to improve CA interpretation skill, with greatest impact on residents. This highlights the importance of incorporating high-fidelity simulation training early in cardiovascular fellowship curricula. © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectClinical competence
dc.subjectDiagnostic angiography
dc.subjectSimulation training
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of simulation training in teaching coronary angiographic views
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentSarver Heart Center, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalBMC Medical Education
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleBMC Medical Education
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-07T01:07:51Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s12909-022-03705-z.pdf
Size:
1.024Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.