Constraining Clouds and Convective Parameterizations in a Climate Model Using Paleoclimate Data
Name:
JAdvModelEarthSyst_2022_Ramos.pdf
Size:
7.911Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Ramos, R.D.LeGrande, A.N.
Griffiths, M.L.
Elsaesser, G.S.
Litchmore, D.T.
Tierney, J.E.
Pausata, F.S.R.
Nusbaumer, J.
Affiliation
Department of Geosciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
cloud and convective parameterizationpaleoclimate model
PPE
proxy-model comparison
speleothem
water isotopes
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Ramos, R. D., LeGrande, A. N., Griffiths, M. L., Elsaesser, G. S., Litchmore, D. T., Tierney, J. E., Pausata, F. S. R., & Nusbaumer, J. (2022). Constraining Clouds and Convective Parameterizations in a Climate Model Using Paleoclimate Data. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(8).Rights
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Cloud and convective parameterizations strongly influence uncertainties in equilibrium climate sensitivity. We provide a proof-of-concept study to constrain these parameterizations in a perturbed parameter ensemble of the atmosphere-only version of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies Model E2.1 simulations by evaluating model biases in the present-day runs using multiple satellite climatologies and by comparing simulated δ18O of precipitation (δ18Op), known to be sensitive to parameterization schemes, with a global database of speleothem δ18O records covering the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), mid-Holocene (MH) and pre-industrial (PI) periods. Relative to modern interannual variability, paleoclimate simulations show greater sensitivity to parameter changes, allowing for an evaluation of model uncertainties over a broader range of climate forcing and the identification of parts of the world that are parameter sensitive. Certain simulations reproduced absolute δ18Op values across all time periods, along with LGM and MH δ18Op anomalies relative to the PI, better than the default parameterization. No single set of parameterizations worked well in all climate states, likely due to the non-stationarity of cloud feedbacks under varying boundary conditions. Future work that involves varying multiple parameter sets simultaneously with coupled ocean feedbacks will likely provide improved constraints on cloud and convective parameterizations. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.Note
Open access journalISSN
1942-2466Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2021MS002893
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.