Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment
Author
Summers, A.J.Devadhasan, J.P.
Gu, J.
Montgomery, D.C.
Fischer, B.
Gates-Hollingsworth, M.A.
Pflughoeft, K.J.
Vo-Dinh, T.
Aucoin, D.P.
Zenhausern, F.
Affiliation
Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine, University of ArizonaDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, College of Engineering
Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Chemical SocietyCitation
Summers, A. J., Devadhasan, J. P., Gu, J., Montgomery, D. C., Fischer, B., Gates-Hollingsworth, M. A., Pflughoeft, K. J., Vo-Dinh, T., Aucoin, D. P., & Zenhausern, F. (2022). Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment. ACS Omega.Journal
ACS OmegaRights
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Antibody microarrays have proven useful in immunoassay-based point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases. Noncontact piezoelectric inkjet printing has advantages to print antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose substrates for this application due to its compatibility with sensitive solutions and substrates, simple droplet control, and potential for high-capacity printing. However, there remain real-world challenges in printing such microarrays, which motivated this study. The effects of three concentrations of capture antibody (cAb) reagents and nozzle hydrostatic pressures were chosen to investigate three responses: the number of printed membrane disks, dispensing performance, and microarray quality. Printing conditions were found to be most ideal with 5 mg/mL cAb and a nozzle hydrostatic pressure near zero, which produced 130 membrane disks in a single print versus the 10 membrane disks per print before optimization. These results serve to inform efficient printing of antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose membranes for rapid immunoassay-based detection of infectious diseases and beyond. © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2470-1343Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1021/acsomega.2c03595
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.