Evidence of Validity and Normative Values of a New Auditory Backward Masking Test
Affiliation
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
auditory perceptionauditory temporal processing
backward masking
central auditory processing
central auditory processing disorder
hearing tests
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Filippini, R., Leite Filho, C. A., Barros, G. M. S. B., Musiek, F. E., & Schochat, E. (2022). Evidence of Validity and Normative Values of a New Auditory Backward Masking Test. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(17).Journal
Journal of Clinical MedicineRights
Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
There are still no valid, clinically feasible instruments to assess backward masking (BM), an auditory temporal processing (ATP) phenomenon. The aim of this study was to develop, standardize and present evidence of validity for a behavioral test for BM assessment. Young adults were submitted to a BM test (BMT), where they were asked to identify a 1000 Hz pure tone followed by a narrowband noise with interstimulus intervals of 0 to 400 ms and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between −20 and −30 dB. The correct response rate and target sound detection threshold were calculated, and the results compared with those of young adults with abnormal ATP tests and older adults. Diagnostic accuracy analyses were carried out. Young adults with normal ATP obtained an average correct response rate of 89 and 87% for SNR −20 and −30 dB, respectively, with average thresholds between 10 and 15 ms and no difference between the left and right ears. Results were more consistent at SNR −20 dB, and the best diagnostic accuracy was obtained for SNR −20 dB, with good specificity, but low sensitivity. Normative values were obtained for the BMT, which proved to be clinically feasible, with preliminary evidence of validity. © 2022 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2077-0383Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/jcm11174933
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

