Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYe, Yongchang
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoyang
dc.contributor.authorShen, Yu
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jianmin
dc.contributor.authorCrimmins, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorScheifinger, Helfried
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T01:05:02Z
dc.date.available2022-11-16T01:05:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.citationYe, Y., Zhang, X., Shen, Y., Wang, J., Crimmins, T., & Scheifinger, H. (2022). An optimal method for validating satellite-derived land surface phenology using in-situ observations from national phenology networks. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 194, 74–90.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-2716
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.09.018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/666716
dc.description.abstractSatellite-based land surface phenology (LSP) products play an important role in understanding atmosphere-vegetation carbon and energy exchanges. These products have been widely calculated from various satellite observations from local to global scales. However, the quality and accuracy of LSP products are often poorly quantified due to spatial mismatch between satellite observed pixels and in-situ observations. In the present study, we demonstrate an optimal algorithm leveraging the scalability, consistency, and representativeness of rich in-situ observations from national phenology networks to validate LSP products. Specifically, we demonstrate two approaches for validating the phenological timing of greenup onset in the operational Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) LSP product developed at NASA using in-situ observations collected from the Pan European Phenological database (PEP725, 9664 site-years) and the USA National Phenology Network (USA-NPN, 3144 site-years) spanning 2013–2020. The first approach assumes that in-situ data contain observations of phenological transitions (e.g., leaf-out) that are directly comparable with satellite detections. Accordingly, in-situ data were aggregated using four upscaling methods (mean, median, 30th percentile, and minimum bias) to directly compare with VIIRS LSP. The second approach assumes that species-specific phenological timing in in-situ data is basically impossible to spatially reconcile VIIRS LSP, but phenological events in a local area are driven by the same or very similar weather conditions. Therefore, interannual variations and long-term trends were applied to compare VIIRS LSP with in-situ data. The result shows first that the 30th percentile method is more promising in aggregating in-situ observations than the commonly used mean method. Second, direct comparison indicates that VIIRS greenup onset has a mean absolute difference of 13.9 ± 9.8 days with PEP725 in-situ observations and 12.3 ± 10.9 days with USA-NPN observations in well-selected deciduous forest sites. Third, the interannual comparison reveals that VIIRS greenup onset exhibits the same directions of multi-year anomalies and long-term trends as those of both PEP725 and USA-NPN observations in over 70% of sample sites. These findings improve our understanding of the scale mismatch and sample representativeness of species-specific phenology and the uncertainties of long-term LSP detections from remote sensing data.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Aeronautics and Space Administrationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2022 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subjectIn-situ observationsen_US
dc.subjectLSP validationen_US
dc.subjectPEP725en_US
dc.subjectPhenologyen_US
dc.subjectUSA-NPNen_US
dc.subjectVIIRSen_US
dc.titleAn optimal method for validating satellite-derived land surface phenology using in-situ observations from national phenology networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizonaen_US
dc.identifier.journalISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingen_US
dc.description.note24 month embargo; available online: 17 October 2022en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.piiS0924271622002623
dc.source.journaltitleISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
dc.source.volume194
dc.source.beginpage74
dc.source.endpage90


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
manuscriptRsprs_v3-tmc.pdf
Size:
3.680Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record