Between the Patio Group and the Plaza: Round Platforms as Stages for Supra-Household Rituals in Early Maya Society
Name:
MacLellan Castillo JAA 2022 ...
Size:
8.407Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
School of Anthropology, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
social organizationritual
Preclassic Maya
Mesoamerican archaeology
Household archaeology
archaeology of religion
Mesoamerica
Preclassic Lowland Maya
Maya Lowlands
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ElsevierCitation
MacLellan, Jessica, and Victor Castillo. 2022. Between the Patio Group and the Plaza: Round Platforms as Stages for Supra-Household Rituals in Early Maya Society. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 66:101417.Rights
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Low, open, circular platforms were built in residential areas at sites across the Maya lowlands during the Preclassic period (c. 1000 BC – AD 300). These structures were probably used for ritual performances, such as dances. Here, we describe three examples excavated at Ceibal, Guatemala. We argue that round structures were used in supra-household rituals that created overlapping communities between the levels of domestic and public. Using the principles of heterarchy and a practice-based approach to ritual, we examine the physical characteristics of the architecture. During the Late Middle Preclassic (c. 700-350 BC), in the absence of rulers or a strong hierarchy, supra-household rituals at circular platforms in residential areas created different social relationships than did the communal ceremonies in the public plaza. At the transition to the Late Preclassic (c. 350 BC), ritual practices and spaces were reorganized, becoming more homogeneous across residential and public contexts, and relationships among households changed. We suggest that studies of the practices that bring together social groups at levels between public and domestic can yield more complete views of social complexity that are not based solely on inequality or hierarchy.Note
24 month embargo; available online: 18 April 2022ISSN
0278-4165Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Research at Ceibal was funded by the National Geographic Society; National Science Foundation (BCS-0750808, BCS-1518794); National Endowment for the Humanities (RZ-51209-10); Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology–Japan KAKENHI (21101003 and 21101002); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (21402008); and Alphawood Foundation. Additional support was provided by Dumbarton Oaks, the University of Arizona (School of Anthropology, Graduate and Professional Student Council, Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Institute), and the American Council of Learned Societies. Permits were granted by the Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala.Additional Links
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2022.101417ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jaa.2022.101417
