Does Conceptual Transparency in Manipulatives Afford Place-Value Understanding in Children at Risk for Mathematics Learning Disabilities?
Publisher
SAGE Publications Inc.Citation
Lafay, A., Osana, H. P., & Levin, J. R. (2022). Does Conceptual Transparency in Manipulatives Afford Place-Value Understanding in Children at Risk for Mathematics Learning Disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly.Journal
Learning Disability QuarterlyRights
Copyright © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We investigated the effect of conceptual transparency in the physical structure of manipulatives on place-value understanding in typically-developing children and those at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Second graders were randomly assigned to one of three manipulatives conditions: (a) attachable beads that did not make the denominations or ones in the denominations transparent, (b) pipe cleaners that made only the denominations transparent, and (c) string beads that made both the denominations and the ones in the denominations transparent. Participants used the manipulatives to represent double- and triple-digit numerals. Statistical analyses indicated that the transparency of the denominations, but not the transparency of the ones in the denominations, is responsible for children’s number representation and place-value understanding. Descriptive analyses of their responses revealed that the at-risk children were at a greater disadvantage than their typically-developing peers with the attachable beads, failing to use place-value concepts to interpret their representations. © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2022.Note
Open access articleISSN
0731-9487Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/07319487221124088
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).