Sensor cost-effectiveness analysis for data-driven fault detection and diagnostics in commercial buildings
Name:
manuscript_R1_no_changes_track ...
Size:
988.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-01Keywords
Building fault detection and diagnosticsBuilding sensors
Cost analysis
Cost effectiveness
Fault prevalence
Threshold marginal cost
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Zhang, L., Leach, M., Chen, J., & Hu, Y. (2023). Sensor cost-effectiveness analysis for data-driven fault detection and diagnostics in commercial buildings. Energy, 263.Journal
EnergyRights
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Data-driven building fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) is heavily dependent on sensors. However, common sensors from Building Automation Systems are not optimized to maximize accuracy in FDD. Installing additional sensors that provide more detailed building system information is key to maximizing the performance of FDD solutions. In this paper, we present a sensor cost analysis workflow to quantify the economic implications of installing new sensors for FDD using the concept of sensor threshold marginal cost (STMC). STMC does not represent actual sensor cost. Rather, it represents a target cost based on the economic benefit that would be realized through improved FDD performance and one or more specified economic criteria. We calculate STMCs for multiple possible fault types and use fault prevalence information to aggregate STMCs into a single dollar value to determine the cost-effectiveness of a potential sensor investment. We conducted a case study using Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Flexible Research Platform (FRP) test facility as a reference. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of the analysis and highlights the key cost considerations in sensor selection for FDD. The results also indicate that identifying and installing the few key sensor(s) is critical to cost-effectively improve FDD performance.Note
24 month embargo; available online: 15 October 2022ISSN
0360-5442Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125577