Surface Potential Gradients and NEXRAD Radar Reflectivities Before the Onset of Lightning at the KSC-ER
Name:
JGRAtmospheres_2022_Handel.pdf
Size:
4.627Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
atmospheric electricityelectric field
electrification
lightning
precipitation radar
remote sensing
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Handel, S. C., Cummins, K. L., & Krider, E. P. (2022). Surface Potential Gradients and NEXRAD Radar Reflectivities Before the Onset of Lightning at the KSC-ER. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127(18).Rights
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Measurements provided by Next Generation Weather Radar and operational thunderstorm monitoring instruments at the Kennedy Space Center and the Air Force Eastern Range have been examined to determine the initial electrical development of 13 isolated, air mass thunderstorms. The same instruments were used to examine the surface potential gradient prior to and following 13 long, horizontal discharges that propagated into the area. The motivation and primary objective for this work was to evaluate the safety of the existing lightning-related launch constraints associated with surface potential gradient and precipitation radar measurements. The onset of cloud electrification as seen by a large-area surface electric field mill network was detected 3.7–14.6 min before the first lightning discharge, with lead-times that depended on proximity to the storm. In 11 of 13 cases, the first detectable field change was a positive excursion in potential gradient close to the storm, likely indicating initial development of lower positive charge. Lead-times for the radar-derived cloud tops (0 dBZ) reaching −20°C were longer than those for early electrification in all but two cases. Surface potential gradients above +500 V/m or below −100 V/m “warning thresholds” were exceeded before the first lightning flash in all cases. Radar reflectivities >35 dBZ above the −10°C level provided 3–14 min of lead time for lightning. Potential gradients just prior to and near long horizontal discharges exceeded 3 kV/m at most sites and were typically positive. Measurements at a single field mill site would not have provided adequate warning. © 2022 The Authors.Note
Open access articleISSN
2169-897XVersion
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2022JD036681
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.

