Learners sacrifice robust communication as a result of a social bias
Affiliation
Department of Linguistics, Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science, Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2020Keywords
language acquisitionlanguage change
language evolution
language universals
learning biases
miniature artificial language
social biases
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The Cognitive Science SocietyCitation
Fedzechkina, M., & Roberts, G. (2020, March). Learners sacrifice robust communication as a result of a social bias. In S. Denison., M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B.C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2281-2287). Cognitive Science Society.Rights
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Languages are subject to many competing pressures, which originate in individual-level learning and communication biases and in social biases reflecting community-level dynamics. Recent work suggests that certain aspects of language structure, such as the cross-linguistic trade-off between case and constituent-order flexibility, originate in learners' biases for efficient communication: Learners drop redundant case but retain informative case in production. Social biases can lead to retention of redundant case, resulting in systems that require more effort to produce. It is not clear, however, whether social biases can influence the use of informative cues. We tested this by exposing participants to a language with uninformative constituent order and two dialects, only one of which employed case. We manipulated the presence of social biases for and against the case dialect. Learners biased towards the no-case dialect dropped informative case without compensating for the resulting message uncertainty. Case was retained in all other conditions. © 2020 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)Note
Open access articleVersion
Final published versionCollections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).