Affiliation
Department of Management Information Systems, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
Spitzley, L. A., Wang, X., Chen, X., Burgoon, J. K., Dunbar, N. E., & Ge, S. (2022). Linguistic measures of personality in group discussions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.Journal
Frontiers in PsychologyRights
Copyright © 2022 Spitzley, Wang, Chen, Burgoon, Dunbar and Ge. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This investigation sought to find the relationships among multiple dimensions of personality and multiple features of language style. Unlike previous investigations, after controlling for such other moderators as culture and socio-demographics, the current investigation explored those dimensions of naturalistic spoken language that most closely align with communication. In groups of five to eight players, participants (N = 340) from eight international locales completed hour-long competitive games consisting of a series of ostensible missions. Composite measures of quantity, lexical diversity, sentiment, immediacy and negations were measured with an automated tool called SPLICE and with Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. We also investigated style dynamics over the course of an interaction. We found predictors of extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, but overall fewer significant associations than prior studies, suggesting greater heterogeneity in language style in contexts entailing interactivity, conversation rather than solitary message production, oral rather than written discourse, and groups rather than dyads. Extraverts were found to maintain greater linguistic style consistency over the course of an interaction. The discussion addresses the potential for Type I error when studying the relationship between language and personality. Copyright © 2022 Spitzley, Wang, Chen, Burgoon, Dunbar and Ge.Note
Open access journalISSN
1664-1078Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887616
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 Spitzley, Wang, Chen, Burgoon, Dunbar and Ge. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

