Analysis of Telehealth Versus Telemedicine Terminology in the Journal Between 2010 and 2020
Name:
Tele-HealthMed Paper_CDoarn_w ...
Size:
281.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Arizona Telemedicine Program, University of ArizonaDepartment of Pathology, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-04-12
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.Citation
Sodhi, N., Weinstein, R. S., Stewart, K., & Doarn, C. R. (2022). Analysis of Telehealth Versus Telemedicine Terminology in the Telemedicine and e-Health Journal Between 2010 and 2020. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health : The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 28(12), 1861–1865.Journal
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine AssociationRights
© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Introduction: The terms "telemedicine" and "telehealth" are similar, yet, carry different meanings and are often defined differently. Methods: A decadal longitudinal study analyzing the usage of these terms in the Telemedicine and e-Health Journal (TMJ) between 2010 and 2020 was conducted. Looking at the keywords assigned to the "Original Research" articles, "telemedicine" (34%) is used almost three times more than telehealth (12%). Although "other" keywords are assigned at a similar frequency as "telemedicine," a similar pattern is followed for the terms within the text. Results: "Telemedicine" and "other" terms are used the most (36%), while articles using both ("telemedicine" and "telehealth") (15%) or "telehealth" (14%) as terms throughout the article are less. This longitudinal study also analyzed the TMJs editorial board between 2010 and 2020. Most of the board is made up of physicians (MD or DO) (42) or PhDs (33), with 25 out the 75 having dual credentialing. Conclusions: Also, while there is international influence within the board (UK, India, France, Canada, etc.), most of the board is associated with an American organization (educational and/or corporate). Most of the board (34/75) has also been present between 10 and 11 years within the study period (a total of 11 years).Note
12 month embargo; published online: 09 December 2022EISSN
1556-3669PubMed ID
35417253Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1089/tmj.2022.0073