Sustainable bioleaching of lithium-ion batteries for critical materials recovery
Name:
Manuscript_29Oct22_no markup_s ...
Size:
675.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Critical Materials Institute, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Alipanah, M., Reed, D., Thompson, V., Fujita, Y., & Jin, H. (2023). Sustainable bioleaching of lithium-ion batteries for critical materials recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382.Journal
Journal of Cleaner ProductionRights
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has increased substantially over the last few decades due to their longer lifetime, greater resistance to self-discharge, and higher output voltage compared to other battery types. With the global trend of electrifying vehicle fleets, the number of LIBs reaching their end-of-life (EOL) is expected to grow substantially in the next decade. These EOL LIBs represent a significant secondary source of materials (e.g., Li, Co, Ni, Mn) that can be recovered and reused in LIBs or other products. In this study, we developed a bioleaching process that could recover critical materials from EOL LIBs in an economical and environmentally sustainable manner under industrially relevant conditions. Black mass, i.e., cathode-containing powder, prepared from EOL LIBs was leached using a biolixiviant produced from corn stover by Gluconobacter oxydans bacteria. Iron(II) was used as a reducing agent to promote metal dissolution. Techno-economic analysis (TEA) estimated a potential average profit margin of 21% for processing 10,000 t of black mass per year, which represents approximately 30% of the available black mass in the US in 2020. Life cycle assessment (LCA) demonstrated that bioleaching of spent LIBs could be more environmentally sustainable than alternative hydrometallurgical recovery methods such as hydrochloric acid leaching (16–19 kg vs. 43–91 kg CO2 equivalent global warming potential per kg of recovered cobalt). The TEA results are highly dependent on the cost of black mass production, which varies by EOL LIB collection and transportation costs. Emerging technologies for deactivating used LIBs for fire safety at collection centers will allow the transport of EOL LIBs as non-hazardous materials, lower the cost of preparing black mass and thereby increase economic prospects for EOL LIBs recycling using this approach.Note
24 month embargo; available online: 28 November 2022ISSN
0959-6526Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135274
