Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation
Name:
Katsanis BU-FLU-MEL PBC.pdf
Size:
259.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Truscott, LaurelPariury, Holly
Hanmod, Santosh
Davini, Monica
de la Maza, Michelina
Sapp, Lauren N
Staples, Kyleigh
Proytcheva, Maria
Katsanis, Emmanuel
Affiliation
Department of Pediatrics, University of ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center
Department of Pathology, University of Arizona
Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-11-17
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Truscott, L., Pariury, H., Hanmod, S., Davini, M., de la Maza, M., Sapp, L. N., Staples, K., Proytcheva, M., & Katsanis, E. (2022). Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation. Pediatric Blood and Cancer.Journal
Pediatric Blood & CancerRights
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative option for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. Procedure: We present our 10-year experience (October 2012 to October 2021) of consecutive allo-HCT in patients with myeloid malignancies treated on the pediatric HCT service and conditioned with myeloablative targeted dose—busulfan (BU), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL). Twenty-three children, adolescents, and young adult patients (CAYA) (median age 15.4 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 17), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 4), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 2) underwent allo-HCT post-BU-FLU-MEL. Four patients had treatment-related AML/MDS. Donor/stem cell source was matched sibling donor (MSD) PBSC (n = 7), matched unrelated donor (MUD) PBSC (n = 2), umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 3), or haploidentical-BMT (n = 11). Risk stratification was low (n = 2), intermediate (n = 15), high (n = 3), and very high risk (n = 1). The two patients with CML had failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. Results: With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, the relapse rate is only 4.5% with an overall survival (OS) 100%, progression-free survival (PFS) 95.5%, and graft-versus-host-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) 67.8%. The donor source and the acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen significantly impacted grade II–IV aGvHD 66.7% versus 19.2% (p =.039) and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGvHD) 66.7% versus 0% (p =.002) in the patients receiving MSD or MUD PBSC compared to haplo-BMT, respectively, resulting in improved GRFS in haplo-BMT, 83.3% compared to 40% matched donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) (p =.025). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that BU-FLU-MEL is efficacious conditioning for disease control in young patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing MSD or alternative donor allo-HCT, but in the setting of PBSC grafts with cyclosporine A-methotrexate (CSA-MTX) GvHD prophylaxis, it results in an unacceptably high incidence of GvHD.Note
12 month embargo; first published: 17 November 2022EISSN
1545-5017PubMed ID
36394072Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/pbc.30102
