Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyd, C.S.
dc.contributor.authorKerby, J.D.
dc.contributor.authorSvejcar, T.J.
dc.contributor.authorBates, J.D.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, D.D.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, K.W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T00:04:35Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T00:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBoyd, C. S., Kerby, J. D., Svejcar, T. J., Bates, J. D., Johnson, D. D., & Davies, K. W. (2017). The sage-grouse habitat mortgage: Effective conifer management in space and time. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 70(1), 141–148.
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2016.08.012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/667396
dc.description.abstractManagement of conservation-reliant species can be complicated by the need to manage ecosystem processes that operate at extended temporal horizons. One such process is the role of fire in regulating abundance of expanding conifers that disrupt sage-grouse habitat in the northern Great Basin of the United States. Removing conifers by cutting has a beneficial effect on sage-grouse habitat. However, effects may last only a few decades because conifer seedlings are not controlled and the seed bank is fully stocked. Fire treatment may be preferred because conifer control lasts longer than for mechanical treatments. The amount of conservation needed to control conifers at large temporal and spatial scales can be quantified by multiplying land area by the time needed for conifer abundance to progress to critical thresholds (i.e., "conservation volume"). The contribution of different treatments in arresting conifer succession can be calculated by dividing conservation volume by the duration of treatment effect. We estimate that fire has approximately twice the treatment life of cutting at time horizons approaching 100 yr, but, has high up-front conservation costs due to temporary loss of sagebrush. Cutting has less up-front conservation costs because sagebrush is unaffected, but it is more expensive over longer management time horizons because of decreased durability. Managing conifers within sage-grouse habitat is difficult because of the necessity to maintain the majority of the landscape in sagebrush habitat and because the threshold for negative conifer effects occurs fairly early in the successional process. The time needed for recovery of sagebrush creates limits to fire use in managing sage-grouse habitat. Utilizing a combination of fire and cutting treatments is most financially and ecologically sustainable over long time horizons involved in managing conifer-prone sage-grouse habitat.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectcutting
dc.subjectfire
dc.subjectjuniper
dc.subjectpinyon
dc.subjectprescribed burning
dc.subjectsagebrush
dc.titleThe sage-grouse habitat mortgage: Effective conifer management in space and time
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume70
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage141
dc.source.endpage148
refterms.dateFOA2023-01-12T00:04:35Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The-Sage-Grouse-Habitat-Mortga ...
Size:
843.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).