Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps
Name:
PhysRevD.106.083509.pdf
Size:
2.657Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Gatti, M.Jain, B.
Chang, C.
Raveri, M.
Zürcher, D.
Secco, L.
Whiteway, L.
Jeffrey, N.
Doux, C.
Kacprzak, T.
Bacon, D.
Fosalba, P.
Alarcon, A.
Amon, A.
Bechtol, K.
Becker, M.
Bernstein, G.
Blazek, J.
Campos, A.
Choi, A.
Davis, C.
Derose, J.
Dodelson, S.
Elsner, F.
Elvin-Poole, J.
Everett, S.
Ferte, A.
Gruen, D.
Harrison, I.
Huterer, D.
Jarvis, M.
Krause, E.
Leget, P.F.
Lemos, P.
Maccrann, N.
McCullough, J.
Muir, J.
Myles, J.
Navarro, A.
Pandey, S.
Prat, J.
Rollins, R.P.
Roodman, A.
Sanchez, C.
Sheldon, E.
Shin, T.
Troxel, M.
Tutusaus, I.
Yin, B.
Aguena, M.
Allam, S.
Andrade-Oliveira, F.
Annis, J.
Bertin, E.
Brooks, D.
Burke, D.L.
Carnero Rosell, A.
Carrasco Kind, M.
Carretero, J.
Cawthon, R.
Costanzi, M.
Da Costa, L.N.
Pereira, M.E.S.
De Vicente, J.
Desai, S.
Diehl, H.T.
Dietrich, J.P.
Doel, P.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eckert, K.
Evrard, A.E.
Ferrero, I.
García-Bellido, J.
Gaztanaga, E.
Giannantonio, T.
Gruendl, R.A.
Gschwend, J.
Gutierrez, G.
Hinton, S.R.
Hollowood, D.L.
Honscheid, K.
James, D.J.
Kuehn, K.
Kuropatkin, N.
Lahav, O.
Lidman, C.
Maia, M.A.G.
Marshall, J.L.
Melchior, P.
Menanteau, F.
Miquel, R.
Morgan, R.
Palmese, A.
Paz-Chinchón, F.
Pieres, A.
Plazas Malagón, A.A.
Reil, K.
Rodriguez-Monroyv, M.
Romer, A.K.
Sanchez, E.
Schubnell, M.
Serrano, S.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Smith, M.
Soares-Santos, M.
Suchyta, E.
Tarle, G.
Thomas, D.
To, C.
Varga, T.N.
DES Collaboration
Affiliation
Department of Astronomy/Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Physical SocietyCitation
Gatti, M., Jain, B., Chang, C., Raveri, M., Zürcher, D., Secco, L., Whiteway, L., Jeffrey, N., Doux, C., Kacprzak, T., Bacon, D., Fosalba, P., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M., Bernstein, G., Blazek, J., Campos, A., … (DES Collaboration). (2022). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps. Physical Review D, 106(8).Journal
Physical Review DRights
Copyright © 2022 American Physical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present a cosmological analysis using the second and third moments of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years of data (Y3) data of the Dark Energy Survey. The survey spans an effective area of 4139 square degrees and uses the images of over 100 million galaxies to reconstruct the convergence field. The second moment of the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness, contains additional non-Gaussian information. The data is analyzed in the context of the ΛCDM model, varying five cosmological parameters and 19 nuisance parameters modeling astrophysical and measurement systematics. Our modeling of the observables is completely analytical, and has been tested with simulations in our previous methodology study. We obtain a 1.7% measurement of the amplitude of fluctuations parameter S8σ8(ωm/0.3)0.5=0.784±0.013. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales, and between second and third moments. In particular, the measured third moment is consistent with the expectation of gravitational clustering under the ΛCDM model. The addition of the third moment improves the constraints on S8 and ωm by ∼15% and ∼25% compared to an analysis that only uses second moments. We compare our results with Planck constraints from the cosmic microwave background, finding a 2.2-2.8σ tension in the full parameter space, depending on the combination of moments considered. The third moment, independently, is in 2.8σ tension with Planck, and thus provides a cross-check on the analyses of 2-point correlations. © 2022 American Physical Society.Note
Immediate accessISSN
2470-0010Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083509
