Affiliation
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Geological Society of AmericaCitation
Glazner, A. F., Baker, V. R., Bartley, J. M., Bohacs, K. M., & Coleman, D. S. (2022). The Rocks Don’t Lie, But They Can Be Misunderstood. GSA Today, 32(10), 4–10.Journal
GSA TodayRights
Copyright © 2023 The Geological Society of America, Inc. CC-BY-NC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Although the adage "the rocks don't lie" is true-rocks are literal ground truth-their message can be misinterpreted. More generally, it is misguided to favor one form of inquiry, such as field observation, over others, including laboratory analyses, physical experiments, and mathematical or computational simulations. This was recognized more than a century ago by T.C. Chamberlin, who warned against premature adherence to a "ruling theory," and by G.K. Gilbert, who emphasized the investigative nature of geological reasoning. Geologic research involves a search for fruitful, coherent, and causal hypotheses that are consistent with all the relevant evidence and tests provided by the natural world, and field observation is perhaps the most fertile source of new geologic hypotheses. Hypotheses that are consistent with other relevant evidence survive and are strengthened; those that conflict with relevant evidence must be either revised or discarded. © 2022 Geological Society of America. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
1052-5173Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1130/GSATG535A.1
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2023 The Geological Society of America, Inc. CC-BY-NC.