Understanding Conditioning Factors for Hydroelectric Development in Chile: Bases for Community Acceptance
Name:
sustainability-14-15224-v2.pdf
Size:
2.390Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
School of Geography, Development and Environment, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022Keywords
community acceptancehydroelectric development
object of value
public acceptance
renewable energy development
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Escobar-Avaria, C., Fuster, R., Silva-Urrutia, K., Bauer, C., & de la Fuente, A. (2022). Understanding Conditioning Factors for Hydroelectric Development in Chile: Bases for Community Acceptance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22).Journal
Sustainability (Switzerland)Rights
Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Chile has defined an energy development policy in which hydropower is an important part of the energy grid. This energy source has not yet been accepted by many people in local communities. For future hydroelectric development to be more widely accepted, the Chilean Ministry of Energy developed a methodological framework called Objects of Valuation. This framework is aimed at identifying the main community interests that may condition hydroelectric development. The objective of this paper is to analyze the scope of the framework based on a review of the scientific literature and information generated through participatory activities in three basins that have high hydropower potential. Analyzing the results obtained from the application of the framework, four complementary intangible factors not represented by the framework are identified: the lack of validation of a formal participatory process, under-recognition of different worldviews, distrust regarding the development of hydroelectricity, and a sense of self-determination in the community. These factors could potentially condition community acceptance of hydroelectricity, thereby limiting the framework as a decision-making tool. We recommend that this methodological framework should be complemented by the incorporation of intangible elements in the decision-making process, using a systematic tool applicable to spatial planning and strategic environmental-assessment processes. © 2022 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2071-1050Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/su142215224
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).